Correct me if im wrong.. miss.. ang ginawa mong entry ay parang 2 entry.. eba ang not edited.. then eba rin ang d edited mo.. tapos bakit wla mga name member mo? para sa akin kung wlang mga pangalan.. parang copy paste lng ang mga char.. madali lng gawin..
Considering how mind numbingly stupid you are... We're just gonna ignore your comment SIR. 
With all due respect sir, I think it's you who didn't understand the logic behind his comment/argument.
1. "ang ginawa mong entry ay parang 2 entry"
-He was referring to the two seemingly completely different images submitted. First, let us say we are under the assumption that the edited version is the entry to be judged (or declared winner) and the original image is required to prove that;
a. the edited version was actually based on the original image and taken by the tantra player in this server and not from other servers,
b. that the edited version is an original work of the participant/contestant and not plagiarized from other websites.
2. "tapos bakit wla mga name member mo? para sa akin kung wlang mga pangalan.. parang copy paste lng ang mga char"
-His issue is that the contestant can cheat the number of chars on the original image to circumvent the required 20 players by copy-pasting the same char of the contestant but perhaps with different weapons and in a different position. Hence he thought the names should be there to ensure that there are really 20 chars.
3. "madali lng gawin.."
-He was referring to the issue of copy-pasting of "noname" chars (for the original image) and not to the making of the finished product as a lot of you have misunderstood.
The problem here is caused by the lack of general guidelines or event mechanics as to how much do we retain the integrity of the original photos. Take for instance the Asura-Kinmara-Deva(female) image on the edited version of gypsy's entry which are not in the original image, are we allowed to include chars that are not part of the original photos? In fact I cannot identify any of the characters in the edited version that were taken from the original photo and vice-versa. Or maybe my eyes is failing me.
The edited version of the gypsy's entry is nice; beautiful and artistic and yes it requires a lot of time and skill to come out with such art as some of you have strongly willed. The original image was also taken from a wonderful angle. Even the ashram emblems create a sense of symmetry and continuity.
I think our heart is big enough to accommodate our admiration to one person's work and at the same time open to other people's ideas. They don't have to be mutually exclusive.
addendum: same issue with the gangnam entry.
